Tableau Public Revizited | May 27, 2020

It’s been far too long since our last Tableau Public Revizited, but time to get back to reviewing some great work of the past from the community we love so dearly. This week we’re looking at a nice viz by Kate Brown that I originally had lined up for Major League Baseball’s opening week. But, while we don’t yet know when we’ll be seeing baseball games again, we do know that this viz, ‘Enter Sandman,’ published by Kate back on March 30, 2019, captures the career of arguably the best closer the game has ever seen; Mariano Rivera. Let’s get to a few things that make this visualization so special.

Three Things I Love!

Clean Design + Just Enough Context

Kate starts out by doing non-baseball fans a big favor and providing some context. In her title header and again in the top left section of the viz, where readers eyes are drawn to first, she explains a little about Rivera’s career. As we touched on above, he’s one of the best closers the game has ever seen. However, when looking at the charts throughout the visualization, it’s important to know up front that Rivera began his career as a starting pitcher and then transitioned into the closing role after a few seasons.

This explains the high strikeout mark in 1996. In his set-up role, Rivera struck out a career high 130 hitters, but he also threw a career high 107 2/3 innings, nearly 30 more innings than his next highest season. So we would expect his strikeout totals to drop once he transitioned to the bullpen and began throwing closer to 60-80 innings per season. And without the note about his 2002 and 2012 injuries, readers would be wondering why so many of his stats took a dip both of those years. Looking at his stats on baseball-reference.com I can see that in 2002 Rivera pitched just 46 innings and only 8 1/3 in 2012. He threw at least 60 innings every other year he was the Yankees closer. So the context is very important and Kate does a great job of incorporating it into the viz while maintaining a clean design. Well done, Kate!

Use of Color

I really love how Kate uses just two colors (three if you count the white title) in the viz and ties them to team colors, the Yankees navy blue and gray. Also, the way she splits up the title and viz is nice, using the navy as the title background, but the gray as the background throughout the rest of the visualization. There’s no need for any additional colors.

Consistency

And speaking of a clean design, Kate’s use of bar charts throughout was a sound decision. She could have changed it up with different chart types, but why make it difficult for the reader to understand? Bar charts are easy to understand and the use of the same chart type for all five categories allows for easy comparisons across categories. For instance, Rivera enjoys his first 50 save season in 2001. If we look at the other categories, we can see how his strikeouts by season ramp up from 36 in 1998 to 83 in 2001. He also cut his walks in half, with just 12 walks in 2001 vs. 25 the prior season. More strikeouts and fewer walks is a great recipe for success.

What’s another great recipe for success? Do the things Kate did in this visualization. Clean, clear context, color, consistency. Oh and I also just love the image she chose. Great job Kate, this was a fun visualization to explore!!

Coming soon to History Visually on Etsy!

History Visually is an Etsy shop dedicated to capturing this history of great sports teams, careers and moments in visual form, printed and proudly displayed on your wall. While our shop currently offers four items, we have plans to add many more. See below for prints set to become available in 2020.

March Madness Greatest Games Collection | 36×12″ prints

1979 National Championship | Michigan State vs. Indiana State1979 MSU-ISU (complete)

1987 National Championship | Indiana vs. Syracuse1987 IU-Cuse (complete)

1990 West Region Second Round | Loyola Marymount vs. Michigan1990 LMU-Michigan (complete)

1991 National Semifinal | Duke vs. UNLV1991 Duke-UNLV (complete)

1992 East Regional Final | Duke vs. Kentucky1992 Duke-UK (complete)

1994 National Championship | Arkansas vs. Duke1994 Arkansas-Duke (complete)

1997 National Championship | Arizona vs. Kentucky1997 Zona-UK (complete)

2008 National Championship | Kansas vs. Memphis2008 KU-Memphis (complete)

2016 National Championship | Villanova vs. North Carolina2016 Villanova-UNC (complete)

2019 South Regional Final | Virginia vs. Purdue2019 UVA-Purdue (complete)

NBA Retired Jerseys Collection | 18×24″ prints

Los Angeles Lakers Retired Jerseys

Lakers Jerseys

Boston Celtics Retired Jerseys

Celtics 2.2

…also stay tuned for the Philadelphia 76ers, San Antonio Spurs, New York Knicks and Detroit Pistons.

MLB Retired Jerseys Collection | 18×24″ prints

…also coming in 2020 are the New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, Atlanta Braves, Cincinnati Reds, St. Louis Cardinals, Los Angeles Dodgers, San Francisco Giants, Pittsburgh Pirates, Minnesota Twins, Chicago White Sox.

 

Tableau Public Revizited | Mar 6, 2020

Published on March 7, 2018, this week’s Tableau Public Revizited is Explain Data before Explain Data! ‘Beautiful Billboard Bar Chart’ by Tableau Ambassador Sean Miller is an example of superb analysis and storytelling. Sean found a huge outlier in the data and dug in to find out what the cause was behind it. Let’s take a look at Sean’s work.Bars

What makes this great data viz?

  • Clear titles and annotations – In exploring Sean’s work, it’s clear to me he has read and taken away many learnings from Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic’s Storytelling with Data. His clear, descriptive title at the top of the page tells the reader exactly what question will be answered in the visualization below. Sean’s titles/text are consistent throughout the entire viz, helping the reader to easily understand what the visualization is telling them. He does an outstanding job in this area.
  • Simple chart types – Another thing I like about the viz is the use of bar charts, a chart that is easy to understand and quick for readers to consume. In the first chart, the reader’s eyes are instantly drawn to the very tall blue bar at position 20. This is the focal point of the visualization and Sean pulls our attention directly to it. In the second chart, we can also see very quickly the spike in songs that spent exactly 20 weeks on the Billboard Hot 100, beginning in 1991.
  • Use of Color – While the simple chart types themselves aid the reader in quickly understanding the story Sean is telling, his fantastic use of color helps drive it home. He begins with coloring the words “exactly 20 weeks” in the title with blue text, tying them beautifully to the data below that represents songs spending exactly 20 weeks on the Billboard Hot 100.

I wanted to share this visualization because it is an exceptional job of data storytelling. By combining the techniques covered above, Sean has taken a big outlier in the data and told the story behind it in a way that takes the reader only about 20-30 seconds to consume. Great job, Sean!

Tableau Public Revizited | Feb 18, 2020

As I sat down this afternoon, pondering which viz to feature in this installment of Tableau Public Revizited, my mind began to wander. I peered out the window into the frigid Minnesota temperatures outside, thinking of a place and time much warmer than the current 35-below wind chill. A place with lush green grass, sunshine, water and a warm summer breeze. A place perhaps, just like Chebeague Island, Maine.Chebeague Island, MaineI’ve loved this viz, by Sue Grist, ever since I laid eyes on it. With its Jonni Walker-esque style it looks like something right out of a travel magazine. Let’s take a look at Sue’s beautiful piece of art.

What makes this great data viz?

  • Beautiful Design – This map is so beautiful and I love how Sue sort of floats the text that provide more information about Chebeague Island in the waters surrounding the island. The grayed out shape of Maine with the blue dot representing Chebeague Island is a very nice, subtle extension of the title. I wouldn’t have otherwise known where, in Maine, Chebeague Island is, so this not only looks great, but is very helpful to the reader.
  • Use of Color – The yellow dots on the map, indicating summer rentals, are great. I’m not sure how many colors Sue went through before landing on the yellow, but I played around with the viz a little bit and tried several other colors, none of which looked remotely as nice as the yellow she used. Tying the color of the dots to the text is best practice, so nice work there. Another thing Sue did really well was to set the opacity of the yellow dots to 65%. This lightens them up a bit and looks much more professional than if she had left the opacity at 100%. Just look at the difference in the image below.

map3
Left: Opacity set at 65%         |        Right: Opacity set at 100%

  • Ease of Use – Ok, we’ve covered the pure beauty of the visualization as well as Sue’s great use of color, but my favorite part about the ‘Maine: Visit Chebeague Island’ viz is the fact that I could see myself actually using it to plan a trip to Chebeague Island! It’s just so damn easy to use. In the bottom left-hand corner, Sue added a collapsible container where you can select your ideal summer rental based on numbers of bedrooms, bathrooms and/or how many people the unit sleeps. And then, while hovering over the yellow dots, we get a preview of the rental with the ability to navigate to the rental’s website, where we could book a trip right then and there.

So, which Chebeague Island rental was my favorite? Well, I’m glad you asked. I’d have to go with the Hackel Beach House at 47 Jenks Road. For me, this rental won out for several reasons, including its easy access to the beach and huge yard which is ideal for games like bean bags, croquet, bocce ball, etc. I also love the long deck that overlooks the ocean as well as the tongue and groove interior, which really gives it that cabin feel. Lastly, I definitely saw a fire pit in one of the pictures and you simply cannot have a summer cabin getaway without a bonfire to end the night!! While there’s plenty to do around the Hackel Beach House itself, biking around the island and ending up at the Slow Bell Cafe for lunch sounds like a good time. And when the kids are napping, maybe sneaking in a round of golf at the Great Chebeague Golf Club 🙂

It was a lot of fun exploring this viz in detail, Sue. Great job!

Tableau Public Revizited | Feb 4 , 2020

For the third installation of Tableau Public Revizited, we’re looking back at a powerful viz created by Kaleigh Piscioneri just over a year ago, on January 30, 2019. In her viz Kaleigh does an exceptional job breaking down the gender gap in sports. Let’s look at a few elements of this visualization that make it so effective.

Dashboard 1 (12)

What makes this great data viz?

  • Use of Color – I absolutely love the colors Kaleigh uses in this viz and the faded gray is a perfect compliment to let that red really pop, grabbing the reader’s attention. The red is a powerful color to use here and is simple to understand. Anytime we see red in the viz, we know that color is associated with women, as Kaleigh ties it into the quote at the top of the page, as well as in a couple of other places. I can’t imagine a better use of color to tell this story. In my opinion, Kaleigh nails it!
  • Chart Selection – The stacked horizontal bar charts at the top of the viz are nice as they do two things, aiding in the telling of the story while also separating the title from the rest of the visualization.
    • Unit Charts – The main focal point of the viz, Kaleigh’s use of the side-by-side unit charts is brilliant. The charts help drive home the disparity in earnings of professional male and female athletes better than any other chart Kaleigh could have placed here. We can quickly see that in 2017, of the Top 100 highest paid professional athletes in the world, just one was a woman. And in 2018, zero were women.
    • Donuts – Below the unit charts, Kaleigh looks more in depth at the difference in male to female average salary in three sports; basketball, soccer and tennis. The difference in basketball, where the average female salary is 1.3% that of the average male salary, is staggering to see visually. While soccer is not much better, tennis has far and away the smallest gap of the three sports. I like the use of donuts here, as it allows Kaleigh to add the KPIs in the center, while also including the background image to help the reader understand which sport is which.
  • Tooltips Upon first seeing the side-by-side unit charts, your initial thought is likely that you’re interested in knowing which athletes represent each of the dots. It’s a perfect use case for tooltips and Kaleigh does a great job of including more detail, as the reader hovers over a mark. While hovering on a mark, we can see that the female athlete who shows up in the 2017 Top 100 is Serena Williams. Name, rank, gender, sport, country and salary are all included in a very clean, compact layout. Nicely done! 

hover

Exploring the viz – I was particularly interested to see which NBA players would show up each year. The reason being is that in 2015 the NBA salary cap was around $63 million, meaning each team could spend that amount of money on their roster, before being hit with penalties/taxes, if they exceeded that amount. By 2017, in large part to new TV deals, the cap had jumped to just north of $94 million, an increase of $31 million dollars from where it was in 2015. This led to teams over-spending on mid-level (average in terms of talent) free agents in 2017 and 2018, as they had the cap space to burn. Knowing this, I wanted to see how many of those mid-level players made the Top 100. After exploring the viz, I found five players who fit this description; Harrison Barnes, Chandler Parsons, Nic Batum, Steven Adams and Otto Porter Jr. were all among the Top 100, despite none of them ever being selected to an NBA All-Star game. While Batum and Parsons were making eight figures even before their new, free agent deals, the average salary of Barnes, Adams and Porter Jr. jumped from $4.3 million to an astonishing $23.1 million. Nothing like getting a near 600% raise for being just ok at your job!

Overall, I feel Kaleigh does a wonderful job of combining the elements we covered, to bring attention to this glaring gender gap in the earnings of professional athletes. Great viz, Kaleigh!

Tableau Public Revizited | Jan 20, 2020

With 2020 Australian Open underway, this week we’ll be reviziting a beautiful viz from Kate Schaub, published on May 5, 2019. The viz, which has a really cool poster-like feel to it, is titled ‘Serena – The Greatest of All Time’ and it covers the amazing career of tennis superstar, Serena Williams. Let’s get started!Serena _ G.O.A.T. v2First off, just take a step back and zoom out a bit to get a nice full shot of the viz. I really appreciate how well Kate thought through the design and layout of the visualization, as it flows together so well. Alright, let’s see what makes this a great data visualization.

What makes this great data viz?

  • Design/Layout – As we just touched on, the visualization is laid out really well, in an order that makes it easy for the reader to follow.
    • Top section – this section features the title in an absolutely awesome font, while also including Serena’s personal information, ranking by year and some KPIs centered around her titles won and career earnings. Serena’s personal info in the upper left-hand corner is a nice touch, providing us with a little background on Serena Williams the person, before getting into Serena Williams, the tennis superstar. Next, we move onto year end ranking. Kate nails the chart choice here, given the theme, as the circles resemble tennis balls and the line chart gives the effect of the path of the ball. It’s amazing to see how many years Serena was ranked in the Top 7 (15 out of 22 years) and I also love how her 2006 ranking of 95th makes it look as though the ball is bouncing; very cool! Lastly, Kate includes some nice and clean KPIs that provide three key metrics; Grand Slam Titles, WTA Titles and Prize Money.
    • Middle section – After reading the KPI section, my first thought is what Grand Slams has Serena won and how many of each. I like the use of icons here displayed as unit charts, as seeing the actual trophy/medal Serena won adds a little something that we wouldn’t get had Kate gone with a plain circle or square in her unit chart. This also adds to the poster feel, I like it a lot. We can easily see that Serena’s won the Australian Open and Wimbledon seven times apiece, as well as the U.S. Open six times.
    • Bottom section – In this section, Kate provides more detail around Serena’s seventy-two WTA titles. The lollipop charts again give us the tennis ball feel and we can see that Williams started her career with a bang, winning twenty-five titles by the age of 23. However, her career appears to regress from age 24-29, which makes me wonder what happened? A quick Wikipedia search and it looks like Williams battled several injuries during this stage of her career. We then see her reaching peak dominance in her early to mid-thirties, before regressing again in her late thirties. This regression can be attributed to Serena’s pregnancy, which saw her miss almost the entire 2017 season. Lastly, I feel the image of Serena fits well in between the lollipops and the radial chart, which shows Serena’s titles won by playing surface.
  • White Space – Kate does a really nice job of packing a ton of information into the viz, while not making it feel cluttered. She leverages white space to give each section of the visualization plenty of breathing room.
  • Excellent Use of Color – Whether you see yellow or green, let’s just agree that the way the tennis ball color pops against the black background is a thing of beauty! Kate nailed it with this combination and another thing she did very well is to not overuse the large attention grabbing font. She placed it only where she wanted to guide the readers attention; beginning with the title and then the names of the Grand Slams, sticking with a smaller, more basic font for the other headers. She also uses the popping tennis ball color for the two main charts, very well done.
  • Tooltips Provide Context Tooltips are a powerful Tableau feature and particularly viz in tooltips, when used effectively. If we think back to Kate’s use of white space, we can see in the image below that her use of viz in tooltips helps prevent the viz itself from being cluttered. However, the tooltips pack even more insightful information into the viz. When I saw the viz for the first time, I remember thinking, “I wonder how many Grand Slams and how much Prize Money Serena has won compared to everyone else?” Well, wouldn’t you know, Kate included that very information through her use of viz in tooltips. The reader can also see who Serena defeated for each of her Grand Slams, as well as the score.

katetooltip

At the end of the day, this is a really cool visualization that should be framed and hanging on a wall somewhere. It’s pleasing to look at, designed very well and tells the story of one of the greatest athletes of all time. Great work, Kate!

Tableau Public Revizited | Jan 7, 2020

With over 750,000 Tableau Public authors and thousands of visualizations published daily, great visualizations are becoming more and more likely to fly under the radar. We’re most likely to remember the one that garnered thousands of views, a bunch of favorites and perhaps, even, a Viz of the Day. However, there are so many more visualizations on the Tableau Public platform that exhibit great data visualization skills. It’s for this reason that I’d like to introduce Tableau Public Revizited; a project dedicated to celebrating examples of excellent data visualization, which happened to fly a little under the radar, from a Tableau Public number of views standpoint. The only requirement to be considered for selection is that a visualization must have had fewer than 500 views on Tableau Public, at the time of selection. Ok, time to get started with our first visualization of 2020!

We’ll get Tableau Public Revizited underway with this fantastic viz from Justin Davis.NCAA Football SalariesJustin published this viz on October 23, 2019 and with the College Football National Championship game scheduled for Monday, January 13, what better time than now to highlight his viz? You may remember a visualization Justin created back in March, called ‘NCAA Basketball Salaries.’ That viz was recognized as not only March 28th Tableau Public Viz of the Day (#VOTD), but also as Tableau Public Viz of the Week for the week of March 25-29th. NCAA Football Salaries has the same layout, so I like the fact that we’re already familiar with the look and feel. Several elements make this a great Tableau Public visualization. Let’s take a look at the viz.

Justin’s visualization features the salaries of coaches from what are referred to as the ‘Power 5’ conferences of Division I-A college football; these conferences are the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC), the Big 12, the Big Ten, the Pacific-12 (Pac-12) and the Southeastern Conference (SEC). The bottom right section also includes the Top 10 highest paid coaches from schools outside of the Power 5, including independent, Notre Dame.

What makes this great data viz?

  • Simple layout – Grouping the bar charts by conference allows the user to quickly and easily compare salaries not only within each conference, but also across the different conferences. For instance, we can quickly see that Clemson’s Dabo Swinney and Alabama’s Nick Saban are the highest paid coaches in college football…and rightfully so, as these teams have combined to win the last four college football national championships, with two apiece. And furthermore, the only other team to even make an appearance in any of those title games was Georgia in 2017. Two other things grabbed my attention right away;
    • The fact that the highest paid coaches in the Pac-12 are paid quite a bit less than the highest paid coaches within the other Power 5 conferences.
    • Notre Dame’s Brian Kelly earns a salary of just $1.67 million. As a lifelong Irish fan, I’m aware of the fact that NBC has held Notre Dame football TV rights since 1991. And with the latest deal being worth $15 million annually, I assumed Kelly’s contract would be larger, so seeing it highlighted when I opened the viz, captured my attention.
  • Clean formatting – You’ll notice the viz includes no grid lines and no axes. Why? Because, with the way Justin designed the viz, they are unnecessary. He includes a bar chart for each school and labels the value on the inside of the bar, which I love as well in this scenario. Not only does labeling the inside of the bar save some room, but it also allows the user to more easily scan down and read the salaries. It’s a much cleaner look than if he had labeled the ends of the bars. He also stuck with easy to read Tableau fonts which I’m a big fan of. Ok, now to my favorite part and the part that really makes this viz special, in my opinion.
  • Effective Use of Color – Under the title, Justin includes a parameter driven slider, where the user can select a winning percentage of their choice. This then updates the visualization by highlighting coaches who have won at least that percentage of their games. The default is set to 85%, which is a great place to start. When I opened the viz, the first thing I did was slide it down to 50%, as I wanted to see which highly paid coaches failed to win 50% of their games. See the result below. We can see that Purdue’s Jeff Brohm and Florida State’s Willie Taggart were both paid at least $5MM and won fewer than 50% of their games. Taggart was actually fired by FSU earlier this season, after getting out to a 4-5 start, while Brohm is still hanging on as coach at Purdue, but had another disappointing year, finishing 4-8 this season.NCAA Football Salaries (1)
    • One last really cool detail Justin added to the slider is dropping a calculation onto size that makes the 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% bands wider than the others. This helps make them much easier for the user to find. He also leverages a hover parameter action to drive the interactivity on viz itself. param%s

All in all, I think this is a great example of a clean, effective visualization. Easy to understand, as we’re dealing with bar charts, not cluttered at all with any unnecessary text or labeling and powerful in its use of color. Great work, Justin!